cdt

分类: 工具与效率 | 上传者: rube-de | 下载: 0 | 版本: v1.0（最新）

Multi-agent development workflow using Agent Teams. Supports four modes: plan (architect teammate + PM teammate debate → plan.md), dev (developer teammate + code-tester teammate + qa-tester teammate + reviewer teammate iterate → code), full (plan → approval gate → dev), and auto (plan → dev, no gate). Use when tasks benefit from collaborative agent teammates with peer messaging.

更新日志: Source: GitHub https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skills

目录结构

当前层级: plugins/cdt/skills/cdt/

📁 references/
- 📄 dev-workflow.md 16.2 KB
- 📄 plan-workflow.md 12.0 KB
- 📄 researcher-prompt.md 1.6 KB
📄 SKILL.md 6.8 KB

SKILL.md

---
name: cdt
description: "Multi-agent development workflow using Agent Teams. Supports four modes: plan (architect teammate + PM teammate debate → plan.md), dev (developer teammate + code-tester teammate + qa-tester teammate + reviewer teammate iterate → code), full (plan → approval gate → dev), and auto (plan → dev, no gate). Use when tasks benefit from collaborative agent teammates with peer messaging."
license: MIT
compatibility: "Requires Claude Code with CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1. Context7 MCP server is bundled via plugin .mcp.json and starts automatically."
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob Bash Task Teammate TaskCreate TaskUpdate TaskList TaskGet Write Edit AskUserQuestion TeamCreate SendMessage TeamDelete WebSearch WebFetch
metadata:
  author: cdt
  version: "1.0.0"
---

# Claude Dev Team

Multi-agent development workflow with four modes. Pick one based on the user's needs:

| Mode | When to use |
|------|-------------|
| **plan** | Need architecture/design before coding |
| **dev** | Have an approved plan, ready to implement |
| **full** | End-to-end with user approval gate between plan and dev |
| **auto** | End-to-end without approval gate |

Before executing any mode, read [references/plan-workflow.md](references/plan-workflow.md) and [references/dev-workflow.md](references/dev-workflow.md) for detailed step-by-step instructions, spawn prompts, and output templates.

## Architecture

```
Plan Phase (plan/full/auto)     Dev Phase (dev/full/auto)
  Lead (You)                      Lead (You)
  ├── architect  [teammate]       ├── developer    [teammate]
  ├── prod-mgr   [teammate]      ├── code-tester  [teammate]
  └── researcher [subagent]       ├── qa-tester    [teammate]
                                  ├── reviewer     [teammate]
                                  └── researcher   [subagent]
         │                                │
         └──── plan.md (handoff) ─────────┘
```

**Teammates** message each other directly (Architect teammate↔PM teammate, Developer teammate↔Code-tester teammate, Developer teammate↔QA-tester teammate, Developer teammate↔Reviewer teammate).
**Researcher** is a subagent — Lead relays results.

## Roles

### Researcher (subagent — spawn via Task without team_name)

Research specialist for doc lookups. Queries Context7 for library docs, searches web for best practices, returns structured findings with code examples. Bundled as `agents/researcher.md` in this plugin — Context7 MCP is auto-configured via `.mcp.json`.

### Architect (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, plan phase)

Discovers codebase structure using the Explore agent (preferred) or repomix-explorer (if available) for broad understanding, then targets specific files with Glob/Grep/Read for detailed inspection. Reads existing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) from `docs/adrs/` before designing. Designs architecture: components, interfaces, file changes, data flow, testing strategy. Writes new ADRs to `docs/adrs/adr-NNNN-<slug>.md` for each significant decision. References existing ADRs when relevant and supersedes old ones when decisions change. Debates tradeoffs with PM teammate. Messages design to lead and PM teammate. Writes the plan file as their final deliverable.

### Product Manager (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, plan phase)

Validates architecture against requirements. Challenges design with concerns. Produces verdict: APPROVED or NEEDS_REVISION with specifics.

### Developer (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, dev phase)

Implements tasks from plan. No stubs, no TODOs. Matches existing patterns. Iterates with code-tester teammate on failures, qa-tester teammate on QA issues, reviewer teammate on code quality. Updates project documentation (README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md) to reflect implementation changes.

### Code-Tester (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, dev phase, always)

Unit/integration tests. Messages developer teammate with failures + root cause. Max 3 cycles.

### QA-Tester (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, dev phase, always)

Always spawned. Adapts testing approach based on task type: for UI tasks, writes Storybook stories and tests user flows via `npx agent-browser`; for non-UI tasks, runs integration/smoke tests, verifies regression safety, and tests API contracts. Messages developer teammate with issues + evidence. Max 3 cycles.

### Reviewer (teammate — spawn via Teammate tool, dev phase)

Reviews changed files for completeness, correctness, security, quality, plan adherence. Validates review with `/council` (`quick quality` for routine, `review security` or `review architecture` for critical concerns). Scans for stubs. Messages developer teammate with file:line + fix suggestions. Max 3 cycles. Writes the dev report as their final deliverable after review is approved.

## Rules

- One team at a time — cleanup plan-team before starting dev-team
- Teammates debate directly (Architect teammate↔PM teammate, Developer teammate↔Code-tester teammate, Developer teammate↔QA-tester teammate, Developer teammate↔Reviewer teammate)
- Researcher is always a subagent — Lead relays results
- Plan.md is the single source of truth and handoff artifact
- Every task declares `type` (impl|test|docs) and `depends_on`; parallel within waves, sequential between
- Verify build between waves
- Avoid file conflicts between parallel tasks
- Testing + review are mandatory quality gates
- Always cleanup team before finishing
- In dev/full/auto modes, use delegate mode (Shift+Tab) to keep the lead focused on coordination
- Plan mode: do NOT implement — only plan
- If stuck — ask user, don't loop

## Lead Identity

You are a **coordinator**, not an implementer. During active team phases:

### NEVER do these — always delegate instead
- Edit or write source code files (`*.ts`, `*.js`, `*.py`, `*.go`, `*.rs`, `*.tsx`, `*.jsx`, `*.vue`, `*.svelte`, `*.css`, `*.scss`, `*.html`)
- Edit or write test files (`*.test.*`, `*.spec.*`, `__tests__/*`) — delegate to code-tester teammate
- Edit or write project doc files (`*.md`) — delegate to the teammate with context (architect for plans/ADRs, reviewer for reports, developer for project docs)
- Run implementation commands (npm run build, cargo build, etc.) — teammates do this
- Fix code bugs directly — send bug details to the developer teammate
- Explore the codebase during planning (Explore agent, repomix-explorer, Glob/Grep/Read on source files) — delegate to architect teammate

### ALWAYS
- Delegate implementation to the developer teammate via SendMessage
- Delegate testing to code-tester and qa-tester teammates via SendMessage
- Delegate code review to the reviewer teammate via SendMessage
- Relay researcher subagent findings to teammates via SendMessage

### ALLOWED to do directly
- Git operations: commit, push, branch, PR creation

登录后下载/点赞/收藏 ❤ 5 | ★ 0

cdt

目录结构

SKILL.md

举报内容

提示