pr-review

分类: 测试与安全 | 上传者: MiniMax-AI | 下载: 0 | 版本: v1.0（最新）

查看 MiniMax Skills 存储库的拉取请求。在审查 PR、验证新技能提交或检查现有技能是否合规时使用。首先运行验证脚本进行硬检查，然后应用质量指南进行内容审查。触发器：PR 审查、拉取请求、验证技能、检查技能。

更新日志: Source: GitHub https://github.com/MiniMax-AI/skills

目录结构

当前层级: tree/main/.claude/skills/pr-review/

📁 references/
- 📄 quality-guidelines.md 2.6 KB
- 📄 structure-rules.md 1.8 KB
📁 scripts/
- 📄 validate_skills.py 7.0 KB
📄 SKILL.md 2.4 KB

SKILL.md

---
name: pr-review
description: >
  Review pull requests for the MiniMax Skills repository. Use when reviewing PRs,
  validating new skill submissions, or checking existing skills for compliance.
  Run the validation script first for hard checks, then apply quality guidelines
  for content review. Triggers: PR review, pull request, validate skill, check skill.
license: MIT
metadata:
  version: "1.0"
  category: tooling
---

# PR Review Skill

Review pull requests against repository standards. Two-phase process: automated validation, then manual content review.

## Phase 1: Automated Validation (Hard Rules)

Run the validation script to check structural requirements:

```bash
python .claude/skills/pr-review/scripts/validate_skills.py
```

The script checks:
- `SKILL.md` exists in every skill directory
- YAML frontmatter is parseable
- Required fields present: `name`, `description`
- `name` matches directory name
- No hardcoded secrets detected

All ERROR-level checks must pass. WARNING-level items (missing `license`, `metadata`) should be flagged but are not blockers.

See [references/structure-rules.md](references/structure-rules.md) for the complete hard rules specification.

## Phase 2: Content Review (Soft Guidelines)

After automated checks pass, review the PR against quality guidelines:

1. **Skill scope** — Does it overlap with existing skills? Is the boundary clear?
2. **Description quality** — Does the `description` include clear trigger conditions?
3. **File size** — Are reference docs reasonably sized for context window consumption?
4. **API key handling** — If external APIs are used, are credentials read from environment variables?
5. **Script quality** — Do scripts have shebang, requirements.txt, and error handling?
6. **Language** — Are SKILL.md and code written in English?
7. **README sync** — Are `README.md` and `README_zh.md` updated for new skills?

See [references/quality-guidelines.md](references/quality-guidelines.md) for soft guidelines details.

## Review Checklist Summary

### Must Pass (Blockers)
- [ ] `validate_skills.py` exits with code 0
- [ ] PR title follows conventional commit format
- [ ] One PR, one purpose

### Should Pass (Flagged in Review)
- [ ] No functional overlap with existing skills
- [ ] Description includes trigger conditions
- [ ] Files are reasonably sized
- [ ] API keys via environment variables
- [ ] README tables updated for new skills (Source column set to `Community`)

登录后下载/点赞/收藏 ❤ 7.8K | ★ 0

pr-review

目录结构

SKILL.md

举报内容

提示